OMR Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities Pn
SRI Style:
Sustainability Tilt
SDR Labelling:
-
Product:
Pension
Fund Region:
Global
Fund Asset Type:
Equity
Launch Date:
04/07/2008
Last Amended:
May 2026
Dialshifter (
):
Fund/Portfolio Size:
£2.24m
(as at: 30/09/2021)
ISIN:
GB00B39V2208, GB00B39V2083
Objectives:
The Fund seeks to provide growth (through increases in investment value and income) over a rolling five-year period through investment in companies from around the world which have exposure to food and agriculture sectors.
Sustainable, Responsible
&/or ESG Overview:
The Fund is differentiated from other food and agricultural strategies through the level of diversification both along the food and agriculture value chain and geographically. We believe that the value of the whole food economy is expanding and therefore invest across the breadth of the food and agricultural spectrum, “from field to fork”. Within this spectrum, we use our thematic process to identify robust and enduring growth trends and companies that ought to benefit. The resulting portfolio aims to find pockets within the food economy where value is migrating towards and where the addressable market is growing faster than average. We invest in companies that can tap into those expanding profit pools and can defend their competitive position via scale, technology, network effects, or intellectual property. This should enable these companies to find margin expansion opportunities, amplifying earnings growth potential, and helping to generate attractive returns on capital.
Primary fund last amended:
May 2026
Information directly from fund manager.
Fund Filters
Sustainability - General
Has policies that consider (environmental and social) sustainability issues. Strategies vary but are likely to consider environmental issues like climate change, carbon emissions, biodiversity loss, resource management, environmental impacts; and social issues like equal opportunities, human rights, labour standards, diversity and adherence to internationally recognised codes. See individual entry information.
Aim to encourage higher sustainability standards through responsible ownership / stewardship / engagement / voting activity
Publicly report performance against named sustainability objectives
Environmental - General
Has policies which relate to environmental issues. These will typically set out their stance on issues such as pollution, climate change, resource management, biodiversity loss, carbon emissions, plastics and/or additional environmental impacts. Strategies vary.
Has documented policies explaining the approach to environmental damage and pollution. Strategies vary.
Has a policy or theme that relates to managing natural resources more efficiently. Strategies vary. See individual entry information.
Has a written policy or theme focused on waste management - typically to support or encouraging higher levels of recycling and better efficiency / reducing waste. Strategies vary.
Nature & Biodiversity
Has a written biodiversity policy or theme typically aimed at supporting, encouraging and improving environmental protection and safeguarding the natural world (sometimes referred to as 'natural capital'). See eg https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity
Has policies designed to address involvement in irresponsibly managed palm oil or other forms of deforestation (typically exclusion led). Strategies vary.
Has a responsible palm oil policy - typically likely to divert investment away from poor practices.
Has a sustainable fisheries policy that will inform where they can and cannot invest.
Climate Change & Energy
Has policies (documented strategies that explain their position) on climate change related issues such as greenhouse gas/carbon emissions, net zero, transitioning to lower carbon. Strategies vary.
Aims to ensure holdings will reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in line with targets set at COP21 in Paris. The core aim is to help achieve ‘net zero emissions by 2050’ and a ‘maximum global temperature increase of +1.5 to +2 degrees above preindustrial levels’. Strategies and opinions vary.
Social / Employment
Has policies which set out their approach to social issues (e.g. human rights, labour standards, equal opportunities, child labour and/or adherence to internationally recognised codes such as the UN Global Compact). Strategies with social policies typically avoid companies with low standards and/or work to encourage higher standards. See fund information for detail.
Has a labour standards policy - likely to mean they will invest in / favour companies that have higher employment related standards and avoid those with low standards. Strategies vary. See eg https://www.ilo.org/international-labour-standards
Aims to invest in assets with high social values - this may include strong human rights, labour standards and equal opportunities or safety related practices.
Has policies or themes that set out their approach to health and wellbeing issues, typically aims to invest in companies with high standards - or encourage high standards.
Ethical Values Led Exclusions
Has policies that set out their position on ethical or 'personal values' based issues. Strategies vary.
Companies are excluded if they are involved in any aspect of the production chain for tobacco products, including cigarettes, vaping, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco and cigars.
Companies are excluded if they make more than 5% of their revenue from the manufacture, sale or distribution of tobacco products including cigarettes, vaping, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco and cigars.
Excludes companies which make controversial weapons such as landmines, cluster munitions and chemical weapons.
Avoids companies that manufacture weapons intended specifically for military use. Strategies vary - may or may not include non-strategic military products.
Avoids companies with military contracts. This may include medical supplies, food, safety equipment, housing, technology etc
Has a written civilian firearms exclusion policy - meaning that they will not invest in companies that make (or perhaps also sell) handguns made for non-military users.
Avoids companies with significant involvement in the gambling industry. Some may allow a small proportion of revenues to come from this area.
Avoids companies that derive significant income from pornography and related areas. Strategies vary.
Human Rights
Has policies relating to human rights issues. Typically require companies to demonstrate higher standards, although some managers work to encourage improvements. Investee companies are often judged against internationally agreed norms or standards. Strategies vary.
Has policies to avoid companies that employ children.
Has policies or a theme that relates to the responsible management of supply chains. These may relate to employment issues, notably people employed by their suppliers, as well as the sourcing of materials and products.
Has a policy which excludes assets with involvement in Modern Slavery
Meeting Peoples' Basic Needs
Has a thematic investment approach focusing on the ‘silver economy’ - in particular (typically) the issues and opportunities presented by changing demographics. This could include finance, healthcare and medicines and/ or longevity science to extend lifespans. Strategies vary.
Has a theme that may direct investment towards newer forms of food such as plant based meat alternatives. May have one or many themes.
Has a responsible food production or agriculture theme or strand of investment. May have a single or many themes.
Healthcare and or medical theme or area of investment - may have a single or many themes
Gilts & Sovereigns
Does not invest in, or excludes, gilts and/or government bonds.
Does not invest in / excludes 'sovereigns' - debt issued by governments. See eg https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sovereign-debt.asp
Banking & Financials
Can include banks as part of their holdings / portfolio.
Governance & Management
Has policies that relate to corporate governance issues such as board structure, executive remuneration, bribery and/or corporate corruption. These funds will typically avoid companies with poor practices. Strategies vary.
Avoids investing in companies with poor governance practices.(e.g. board structure, management practices etc.) Views may however vary on what counts as 'poor' practices - and funds may not immediately divest as they may prefer to work to encourage higher standards.
Exclude companies that are subject to United Nations sanctions. See eg https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/un-sc-consolidated-list
Has policies explaining how managers will respond to assets / companies that do not comply with relevant anti-bribery and anti-corruption standards or laws. Strategies vary; options include stewardship/ engagement and divestment - or a combination.
Encourage the companies they invest in to have more diverse board structures (e.g. more women on boards)
Encourage the banks and insurance companies they invest in to publish climate change related financial information - as set out by the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (with the aim of helping investors measure and respond to climate risk).
Aim to encourage higher ESG standards through responsible ownership / stewardship / engagement /voting activity
Requires the companies they invest in to report on climate risks that are relevant to their business in their report and accounts
Product / Service Governance
Find fund / asset managers that factor in 'environmental, social and governance' issues as part of their investment decision making process. A focus on 'ESG' typically means a fund is carrying out additional research to help reduce ESG related risks. It does not necessarily mean a focus on sustainability. Strategies vary. See fund literature.
Environmental, social and governance issues are part of this fund’s reporting of their ‘value’ to clients. AoV reporting is a statutory requirement. Including ESG factors in its calculation is not.
Asset Size
Invests more than half of their money in smaller or medium sized companies. (i.e. below around £5 -10 billion)
Invests in a combination of small, medium and larger (potentially multinational) companies / assets.
Impact Methodologies
Specifically sets out to invest in companies that are regarded as 'disrupting' existing business practices - typically through the development of innovative (sustainability aware) products and/or practices.
How The Fund/Portfolio Works
Focuses on finding and investing in companies with positive / beneficial attributes. This strategy can be applied in addition to exclusion criteria and engagement/stewardship activity.
Has principle 'ethical approach' to avoid companies by using negative screening criteria. Strategies vary.
Has a single resource themed focus in their investment strategy on a single natural 'resource' eg water.
Invest more heavily in assets which have higher ESG ratings/standards or scores and less heavily in companies with lower ESG ratings. Where this is central to the strategy you should expect assets in most sectors. Strategies vary.
Invests in assets which have an ESG strategy (which is typically focused on avoiding companies that pose environmental, social or governance related risks) together with additional criteria such as positive and/or negative screens, themes and stewardship strategies.
Considers both the 'positive' and 'negative' aspects of company behaviour and makes balanced, considered decisions as part of their investment approach. May apply to a range of different issues and policy areas.
Focuses on the careful management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) related risks - typically by avoiding or being underweight in companies seen as posing major risks in these areas (i.e. not necessarily by using themes, exclusions etc).
Publish explanations of their ethical, social and/or environmental policies online (i.e. investment decision making strategies/ buy/sell &/or asset management strategies).
Does not use stock lending for performance or risk purposes.
Unscreened Assets & Cash
Holds between 70-79% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
Holds between 80-89% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
Holds at least 90% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
Only invests in cash to aid the practical management (buying and selling) of assets and so do not use additional financial instruments.
All assets - except cash - meet the sustainability criteria published in strategy documentation.
Intended Clients & Product Options
Designed to meet the needs of individual investors with an interest in sustainability issues.
Designed for clients who care about ethical and values-based issues, often alongside sustainability issues also.
Available via a tax efficient ISA product wrapper.
Only applicable for DFM’s & portfolio providers. Find service providers who offer bespoke ('personalised') SRI / ESG portfolio options
Fund Management Company Information
About The Business
Find fund / asset management companies that are smaller or specialise in particular areas - notably, ideally ESG related. Strategies vary.
Finds fund / asset management companies that have a published company wide stewardship, engagement and / or responsible ownership policy or strategy that covers all investments. Stewardship typically involves encouraging higher ESG standards through voting and dialogue.
Find fund / asset management companies that actively encourage higher 'environmental, social and governance' and / or 'sustainable and responsible investment' practices across investee companies - typically where the aim is to encourage positive change that is aligned with the best interests of investors. Strategies vary. See additional information and options.
Find fund / asset managers that vote all* the shares they own at Annual General Meetings and Extraordinary General Meetings. A commitment to voting shares is a key indicator of 'responsible share ownership' demonstrating their support for or disagreement with management policy. (*situations can legitimately, occasionally occur where voting proves impossible, but in principle all shares should be voted.)
Find fund / asset managers that consider responsible ownership and ESG to be a key differentiator for their business.
Find options run by managers that apply Responsible ownership or 'Stewardship' policies to all or most of their investment assets. This means active involvement (e.g. voting, dialogue) with the companies across all or most funds, products and services.
Find fund / asset management companies that consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues when deciding whether or not to invest in a company for all / almost all of their funds and other assets. This is increasingly seen as part of sound risk management.
Finds organisations / fund managers that have an in-house (company wide) diversity improvement programme - meaning that they are working to ensure that within their own businesses they employ people from diverse backgrounds - often typically focused on ethnicity and/or sex.
Find fund / asset management companies that encourage the companies they invest in to have strong diversity, race, gender and other equality policies across all assets held, not simply screened or themed SRI/ESG funds. (ie Asset Management company wide).
Fund management entity offers unstructured intermediary training on sustainable investment (ie for financial advisers and wealth managers)
Collaborations & Affiliations
Find fund / asset management companies that have signed up to the UN backed 'Principles of Responsible Investment'.
A member of the Taskforce for Nature Related Financial Disclosures group which aims to aid risk management and shift money towards nature-positive outcomes.
Fund management entity is a member of the Investment Association https://www.theia.org/
Resources
Find fund / asset management companies that employ people to steer and support fund managers in voting shares at company AGM's and EGMs in ways that are consistent with encouraging higher ESG/sustainability standards.
Find a fund / asset management company that directly employs specialist ESG/SRI/sustainability researchers or analysts. This allows asset managers to discuss environmental, social and governance risks and opportunities directly with companies.
Find fund / asset management companies that makes use of expert external research companies. This can help deliver specialist expertise and means resources are pooled with other investors.
Finds organisations / fund managers that have one or more ESG/sustainability experts on all investment teams or 'desks' (all asset types)
Accreditations
Finds organisations / fund managers that have an A+ PRI rating - meaning they are highly rated according to the 'Principles of Responsible Investment'
Find fund / asset managers that are signatories to the FRC UK Stewardship Code, which sets out a framework for constructive investor / investee relations where managers are encouraged to behave like responsible, typically longer term 'company owners'.
Engagement Approach
Find fund / asset management companies that regularly initiate or run industry wide (collaborative) investor projects aimed at raising environmental, social and governance standards amongst investee companies.
Find fund / asset management companies that are working with the companies they invest in to encourage more responsible corporate taxation.
Fund / asset manager has stewardship /responsible ownership strategy that is focused on addressing climate change with investee assets.
Fund / asset manager has a stewardship /responsible ownership strategy that involves working with fossil fuel companies on climate change related issues. See fund manager website for details.
Fund / asset manager has stewardship /responsible ownership strategy with involves encouraging investee asset to reduce plastic waste and pollution.
Fund / asset manager has a stewardship / responsible ownership policy that means they are working to encourage more responsible mining practices - where environmental and social issues are properly dealt with by the companies they invest in.
The fund / asset manager has a responsible ownership / stewardship strategy that focuses on biodiversity and nature issues relating to the assets they invest the aim of which will be to reduce harm and or deliver improvement. Strategies vary. https://tnfd.global
Fund / asset manager has a responsible ownership / stewardship strategy which means they are working to encourage the shift to more sustainable business practices in ways that respect and are sensitive to social issues and the impact change has on people effected by the changes that are taking place. https://www.transitionpathwayinitiative.org/ https://transitiontaskforce.net/
Fund / asset manager has responsible ownership / stewardship strategy in place which aims to address human rights issues in investee companies (and potentially their suppliers) with the aim of raising standards
Fund / asset manager has responsible ownership / stewardship strategy in place that aims to improve labour standards for the benefit of employees in investee companies (and potentially their suppliers)
Fund / asset management company has a stewardship strategy in place which involves working to raise diversity, equality and inclusion standards across investee assets
Fund / asset manager is working with the assets they hold to help stamp out modern slavery - where direct or indirect company employees are exploited for business benefits.
Fund / asset managers have stewardship strategies in place that focus on improving governance standards across investee assets
Has a stewardship / responsible ownership strategy that encourages responsible supply chain - ie the managers will discuss environmental, social and governance issues with investee companies with the aim of raising standards
Working to address sustainability, ESG and related concerns around artificial intelligence.
Escalation policies describe how a manager will proceed if stewardship / engagement activity is not successful in the short term.
Company Wide Exclusions
Find fund / asset management companies (not funds) that avoid investment in 'controversial weapons' across all of their funds and other investment vehicles.
Find funds / asset managers that are reviewing, or have reviewed, their exposure to carbon intensive industries including (but not only) mining, oil and gas companies. (Typically with reference to climate change.)
This fund / asset manager has a strategy in place that will lead them to exit direct investments in the coal mining industry. Managers ability to do this may depend on the geographic regions in which they invest.
Climate & Net Zero Transition
Fund / asset management organisations that have pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to ‘net zero’. Strategies vary - this area is changing rapidly.
Fund / asset manager AGM / EGM voting strategy has processes in place that mean they will normally be expected to vote in a way that will encourage the transition to net zero greenhouse gas emissions.
Find fund / asset management companies that have published a Climate Risk policy or statement that is signed / owned by their Chief Executive.
This fund / asset management company has set a date by which they plan to achieve net zero greenhouse gas / CO2e emissions.
Find fund / asset management companies that are working with the companies they invest in to encourage reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions.
Finds organisations / fund managers that have published ‘forward looking climate metrics’ e.g. 'implied temperature rise' data that are a total of the asset management company's share (% owned) of all the investee company emissions of the assets they manage, as well as their own direct and other indirect emissions.
This fund / asset management company plans to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (CO2e) emissions with the help of a scheme that will lock away an amount of carbon that is equivalent to the company’s own emissions – so that the end result is ‘net zero’. Calculations and scope vary.
Find fund / asset management companies that are working to reduce their own (fund management company) carbon/greenhouse gas emissions.
See https://sciencebasedtargets.org/
Transparency
Find fund / asset management companies that publish a report detailing their responsible investment ownership - also known as 'Stewardship' - activity.
Find fund / asset management companies that publish information about their sustainable and responsible investment strategies on their company website.
Fund / asset management companies that publish a full record of how they vote their shares at AGMs (annual general meetings) and EGMs (extraordinary general meetings). Voting strategies have an important role to play encouraging higher environmental, social and governance standards.
This fund / asset management company has published a plan that explains how they will align to the climate change commitments made at the Paris Climate Talks, COP21.
This fund / asset management company has published a plan that explains how they are going to achieve net zero greenhouse gas / CO2e emissions.
Comments
Please Note:
- Vulnerable client policy on website (AFM companywide): We do maintain a comprehensive vulnerable client policy; however, due to the sensitive nature of its contents, this is not something we would typically make publicly available. It may be helpful to consider that the absence of a published document does not necessarily indicate the absence of a policy or supporting processes. Could the criterion be re-framed to ‘vulnerable client policy’?
- PRI rating (AFM companywide): We noted that the reference to a “PRI A+ rating” reflects the previous scoring system. The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) transitioned to a 1–5 star rating system in 2021, with further updates in 2023 and 2025. It may be worth updating this field to align with the current framework. In our most recent 2025 PRI assessment, we were pleased to receive five stars in five out of six modules, and four stars in the remaining module, and would welcome the opportunity to reflect this more accurately.
Sustainable, Responsible &/or ESG Policy:
Sarasin & Partners has one of the longest track records of investing in the food and agriculture space, having launched the strategy in 2008. Our strategy is differentiated from other food and agricultural strategies through our allocation, both along the food and agriculture value chain, and geographically. We tailor our wider three core pillar (thematic investing, responsible ownership, active management) investment approach to opportunities that underpin growth in the food and agriculture economy.
Many food and agriculture investment strategies concentrate on the largest agriculture-related companies, which tend to be heavily exposed to large-scale, intensive farming operations. This sector is highly productive with tightly managed, pest controlled and waste minimised inputs. It relies on a system managed to maximise arable and economic yields, but offers limited room for further improvement in capital returns and productivity growth and is increasingly challenged by the trend towards a more sustainable, resilient, and lower greenhouse gasses emitting agricultural system.
Analysis of the changing economic value in the food chain highlights the rapid increase in the downstream food economy: in the storage, processing and retailing of food and in the health and food technology which offer new and sustainable growth opportunities.
Underlying these themes is a shift towards more sustainable and environmentally considerate approaches to food, which is strongly reflected in the Strategy’s ESG policy: since launch, the Strategy has avoided exposure to pesticides, palm oil and beef producers.
The Food and Agriculture Opportunities Fund also avoids companies that are materially engaged in certain sectors, including the production or distribution of tobacco, armaments, gambling and adult entertainment.
Process:
Our aim is to deliver enduring value for our clients across market cycles. When we invest on behalf of our clients, we look to the long-term prospects of a company. We purchase shares where there is a case for enduring value creation, and where this is currently underappreciated by the market.
We also believe that responsible companies will tend to create more durable economic value. Specifically, we favour businesses that articulate compelling long-term strategies, and take seriously their responsibilities to their customers, supply chain, staff, local communities, the environment, and their shareholders.
Once we become shareholders on behalf of our clients, we believe it is important to build lines of communications with the executives and the Board of Directors. Stewardship is as much about ongoing responsible ownership as to the considered approach to selecting investee companies. We also believe that our clients’ long-term interests are not best served by a narrow focus on relative performance against a market index. The service we offer goes beyond beating a benchmark: first and foremost, we start with our clients’ needs and take a holistic approach. We would not, for instance, deploy capital in a company whose success involves causing significant harm elsewhere, which could damage our clients’ interests. Where we believe we can play a positive role in boosting broader market returns through improved government policies or market practices we will seek to catalyse change.
We aim to invest in companies that benefit from our ‘global themes’, or societal trends such as digitalisation, automation, ageing, emerging consumption, climate change and security. Further, we seek companies that are able to drive long-term performance through credible strategies to transform these strengths into enduring value, and demonstrating robust governance structures that will protect shareholders’ and creditors’ interests.
Environmental, governance and social factors are considered alongside other value drivers in determining a company’s ‘investment case’ and ‘risks to investment’. Companies’ long-term success depends on strategies that sustainably deliver goods or services valued by customers, such that companies earn an attractive return, maintain their license to operate and prosper. A company’s relations with core stakeholders, from employees, to suppliers, to regulators, to local communities to other groups that are impacted by (and may impact) the company’s operations, as well as its environmental performance, are important considerations.
ESG is, therefore, a required part of our analysis, and where we identify potential material impacts, this must be reflected within the valuation of each company. As part of our financial modelling we assess the materiality of ESG headwinds or tailwinds for every company and incorporate this into our fair value assessment. This therefore has an impact on portfolio construction as it is part of the fundamental assessment of a company, which is considered in the investment decision and position sizing.
The key sustainability issues for food and agriculture include, but are not limited to, deforestation, depletion of water tables and contamination of the water system, carbon emissions from agriculture, pesticides, circular economy and biodiversity.
Idea Generation
The Strategy focuses exclusively on opportunities in the food and agriculture sector. We begin by identifying themes from both a top-down, “big picture” perspective and from our bottom-up, fundamental analysis of industries and companies.
By looking at the world with a multi-thematic perspective. we ensure that we are investing in alignment with the development of society, and avoid business activities that are unsustainable or in structural decline.
Whilst these themes are grounded in sustainability, climate change as one of our six mega-themes has the most direct link to sustainability. Examples of these themes include diet change, nutrition & health, rising productivity, decarbonising food system; and food security and resilience.
We then produce a set of companies in which we could invest to capture each theme. The combination of these forms our investment universe, which contains around 550 companies that the Strategy could potentially invest in.
From this discrete investment universe, we conduct thorough fundamental analysis, including an ESG assessment.
Stock Selection
Our thematic process aims to capture future growth, which demands consideration of sustainability as we seek investable ideas. Once we determine which companies are worthy of analysis, our analysts begin to build the investment case, and determine fair value.
Our research process has ESG explicitly integrated into the analysis, as well as the wider considerations to the investment thesis. These impacts can be positive or negative.
We utilise our own framework and ratings system, Sarasin Sustainability Impact Matrix (SIM) to represent our proprietary ESG analysis. This analysis is bottom-up and driven by primary research, supplemented with ESG data from MSCI, ISS and other sources.
These are then summarised in a higher-level E, S and G traffic light rating. This tool evaluates approximately 160 data points, categorising each factor as Red, Amber, or Green, based on the severity, materiality and potential impact (both positive and negative) for each. The ratings reflect absolute, not relative, risks to capital. This means that companies in a particular sector or geography may cluster around higher or lower scores reflecting in part the business practices of a sector or country they operate in. The lower scores for this geography/sector would naturally suggest we need to be more cautious here.
Furthermore, analysts assign an overall ESG score from A-E, and momentum indicators where we believe there to be significant direction of travel. “A” indicates ESG is a positive tailwind for the investment case; whereas “E” is effectively un-investable. The outcome of this rating system results in an overall ESG score between A and E.
Our analysts are all ESG analysts, and have the ability to adjust various inputs to their models of fair value for ESG impacts. The analysts own their valuations, but are challenged by the team, including our stewardship specialists on any ESG factors included or not considered. This is often an adjustment to the discount rate/ weighted average cost of capital (WACC) but can be incorporated into capital expenditure forecasts, impairments, revenue and/or cost impacts to name a few. We believe this analysis will depend on the case in hand, so analysts need to have the opportunity to determine how the economics of the business will in reality be impacted. Our analysts will also simulate three differing scenarios; bull, base and bear that can be used to reflect the pace or scale of ESG impacts to the economic model.
Materiality must be modelled based on an understanding of the economics, not rules. As specific ESG issues will be more or less material depending on a company’s sector and business model, we do not adopt a formulaic link between the “traffic light” assessment and overall ESG rating (e.g. two ambers and one green do not necessarily equate to a B). Instead, a stock note will illustrate how our assessment of material ESG issues (structured by the “traffic lights”) has informed our view of a company’s ESG risk and materiality, which is captured by the letter rating. The ESG assessment will naturally inform the final stock rating alongside other inputs. For instance, a stock rated 2 with an ESG rating of C will incorporate an analysis, how this flows through to the model and the valuation impact from the identified ESG factors.
Whilst we have a team of stewardship specialists that are custodians of our ESG considerations and engagement activity, they are part of the investment team and contribute to team discussion and challenge alongside the thematic equity analysts.
Portfolio Construction
We aim to build a portfolio of between 35 and 50 stocks and this will vary depending on the number of compelling investment ideas we identify and the risk profile of these companies. Stocks are selected from the Food & Agriculture Buy list but the Portfolio Managers are not compelled to buy any particular stock - they are fully responsible for the construction and performance of the Strategy.
Once we have bought a stake in a company, we stay close to it. We monitor the business’ strategic outlook and performance, its critical value drivers to ensure their persistence, and our conviction in the stock’s long-term value proposition. Engagement and voting are key considerations throughout our research process in order to communicate with management on ESG and other issues and press where we see a need for change. A considered approach to voting is vital not just because it is a key avenue through which we can express our views, but also because it supports our relationships with the company’s Board of Directors and executives.
Data sources
The vast majority of our ESG analysis is proprietary, integrating bottom-up research across our 15 key E, S and G issues. This primary analysis is complemented by secondary data sources and feeds directly into company valuation, investment conviction and position sizing. Our traffic light system helps identify potential, minimal or material risks to capital and informs our active engagement priorities.
We use a range of external providers to support our research, including MSCI and ISS, as well as ESG networks such as ICGN and ACGA, alongside sell-side and independent research. While these inputs enhance our process, they do not replace our proprietary ESG and stewardship analysis, which remains the foundation of our approach. MSCI data is also used for ethical screening.
We incorporate company disclosures, insights from external experts, NGOs and government publications, and participate in academic research and industry discussions to identify emerging themes and opportunities.
Additionally, we leverage the proprietary Sustainability Matrix® developed by Bank J. Safra Sarasin, which aggregates and analyses data from multiple providers (including MSCI ESG, GMI, RepRisk and Vigeo Eiris) to provide further sustainability insights.
Resources, Affiliations & Corporate Strategies:
Our approach to responsible investment is delivered primarily through active stewardship, rather than a single overarching policy. This is articulated through our Stewardship Framework, Principles for Engaged Ownership, Ownership Discipline, and Corporate Governance & Voting Guidelines, all of which are publicly available on our website: https://sarasinandpartners.com/stewardship/. Our annual Stewardship Report provides a consolidated overview of how these frameworks are implemented in practice.
We have a dedicated stewardship team responsible for leading engagement, voting and public policy advocacy. ESG integration is embedded across the investment team, with all analysts and portfolio managers incorporating ESG factors into company analysis and investment decisions. Analysts retain ownership of ESG ratings, which are developed in collaboration with, and approved by, stewardship specialists – ensuring consistency and joint accountability across the investment process.
Our governance structure supports robust oversight of stewardship activities. The Board retains ultimate responsibility, with stewardship a standing agenda item, and delegates implementation to the Executive Committee. Oversight is further supported by the Asset Management Committee and the Stewardship Steering Committee, which provides cross-business input, reviews stewardship priorities, and oversees policies, activities and reporting. The Head of Stewardship leads the programme, working closely with senior investment leaders. We also convene external advisory panels, such as our Climate Active Advisory Panel, to provide independent expert input on key themes.
We are active participants in a wide range of global initiatives and collaborative engagements spanning environmental, social and governance themes. These include the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative (NZAM), Climate Action 100+ (as a co-lead engager), Nature Action 100+, CDP, Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN). We also contribute to initiatives focused on plastics and circular economy (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Plastic Solutions Investor Alliance), human rights and labour standards (Investor Alliance for Human Rights, ICCR, FAIRR), and responsible technology (World Benchmarking Alliance, Global Network Initiative).
A full list of our memberships, initiatives, and relevant policies and statements is available on our website: https://sarasinandpartners.com/stewardship/signatories/
| Fund Name | SRI Style | SDR Labelling | Product | Region | Asset Type | Launch Date | Last Amended |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMR Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities Pn |
Sustainability Tilt | - | Pension | Global | Equity | 04/07/2008 | May 2026 | |
ObjectivesThe Fund seeks to provide growth (through increases in investment value and income) over a rolling five-year period through investment in companies from around the world which have exposure to food and agriculture sectors. |
Fund/Portfolio Size: £2.24m (as at: 30/09/2021) ISIN: GB00B39V2208, GB00B39V2083 |
|||||||
Sustainable, Responsible &/or ESG OverviewThis product is linked to the "Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities" fund. The following information refers to the primary fund. The Fund is differentiated from other food and agricultural strategies through the level of diversification both along the food and agriculture value chain and geographically. We believe that the value of the whole food economy is expanding and therefore invest across the breadth of the food and agricultural spectrum, “from field to fork”. Within this spectrum, we use our thematic process to identify robust and enduring growth trends and companies that ought to benefit. The resulting portfolio aims to find pockets within the food economy where value is migrating towards and where the addressable market is growing faster than average. We invest in companies that can tap into those expanding profit pools and can defend their competitive position via scale, technology, network effects, or intellectual property. This should enable these companies to find margin expansion opportunities, amplifying earnings growth potential, and helping to generate attractive returns on capital. |
||||||||
|
Primary fund last amended: May 2026 |
||||||||
|
Information received directly from Fund Manager |
||||||||
|
Please select what you would like to read:
Fund FiltersSustainability - General
Sustainability policy
Has policies that consider (environmental and social) sustainability issues. Strategies vary but are likely to consider environmental issues like climate change, carbon emissions, biodiversity loss, resource management, environmental impacts; and social issues like equal opportunities, human rights, labour standards, diversity and adherence to internationally recognised codes. See individual entry information.
Encourage more sustainable practices through stewardship
Aim to encourage higher sustainability standards through responsible ownership / stewardship / engagement / voting activity
Report against sustainability objectives
Publicly report performance against named sustainability objectives Environmental - General
Environmental policy
Has policies which relate to environmental issues. These will typically set out their stance on issues such as pollution, climate change, resource management, biodiversity loss, carbon emissions, plastics and/or additional environmental impacts. Strategies vary.
Environmental damage & pollution policy
Has documented policies explaining the approach to environmental damage and pollution. Strategies vary.
Resource efficiency policy or theme
Has a policy or theme that relates to managing natural resources more efficiently. Strategies vary. See individual entry information.
Waste management policy or theme
Has a written policy or theme focused on waste management - typically to support or encouraging higher levels of recycling and better efficiency / reducing waste. Strategies vary. Nature & Biodiversity
Biodiversity / nature policy
Has a written biodiversity policy or theme typically aimed at supporting, encouraging and improving environmental protection and safeguarding the natural world (sometimes referred to as 'natural capital'). See eg https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity
Deforestation / palm oil policy
Has policies designed to address involvement in irresponsibly managed palm oil or other forms of deforestation (typically exclusion led). Strategies vary.
Responsible palm oil policy
Has a responsible palm oil policy - typically likely to divert investment away from poor practices.
Sustainable fisheries policy
Has a sustainable fisheries policy that will inform where they can and cannot invest. Climate Change & Energy
Climate change / greenhouse gas emissions policy
Has policies (documented strategies that explain their position) on climate change related issues such as greenhouse gas/carbon emissions, net zero, transitioning to lower carbon. Strategies vary.
Paris aligned strategy
Aims to ensure holdings will reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in line with targets set at COP21 in Paris. The core aim is to help achieve ‘net zero emissions by 2050’ and a ‘maximum global temperature increase of +1.5 to +2 degrees above preindustrial levels’. Strategies and opinions vary. Social / Employment
Social policy
Has policies which set out their approach to social issues (e.g. human rights, labour standards, equal opportunities, child labour and/or adherence to internationally recognised codes such as the UN Global Compact). Strategies with social policies typically avoid companies with low standards and/or work to encourage higher standards. See fund information for detail.
Labour standards policy
Has a labour standards policy - likely to mean they will invest in / favour companies that have higher employment related standards and avoid those with low standards. Strategies vary. See eg https://www.ilo.org/international-labour-standards
Favours companies with strong social policies
Aims to invest in assets with high social values - this may include strong human rights, labour standards and equal opportunities or safety related practices.
Health & wellbeing policies or theme
Has policies or themes that set out their approach to health and wellbeing issues, typically aims to invest in companies with high standards - or encourage high standards. Ethical Values Led Exclusions
Ethical policies
Has policies that set out their position on ethical or 'personal values' based issues. Strategies vary.
Tobacco & related product manufacturers excluded
Companies are excluded if they are involved in any aspect of the production chain for tobacco products, including cigarettes, vaping, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco and cigars.
Tobacco & related products - avoid where revenue > 5%
Companies are excluded if they make more than 5% of their revenue from the manufacture, sale or distribution of tobacco products including cigarettes, vaping, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco and cigars.
Controversial weapons exclusion
Excludes companies which make controversial weapons such as landmines, cluster munitions and chemical weapons.
Armaments manufacturers avoided
Avoids companies that manufacture weapons intended specifically for military use. Strategies vary - may or may not include non-strategic military products.
Military involvement exclusion
Avoids companies with military contracts. This may include medical supplies, food, safety equipment, housing, technology etc
Civilian firearms production exclusion
Has a written civilian firearms exclusion policy - meaning that they will not invest in companies that make (or perhaps also sell) handguns made for non-military users.
Gambling avoidance policy
Avoids companies with significant involvement in the gambling industry. Some may allow a small proportion of revenues to come from this area.
Pornography avoidance policy
Avoids companies that derive significant income from pornography and related areas. Strategies vary. Human Rights
Human rights policy
Has policies relating to human rights issues. Typically require companies to demonstrate higher standards, although some managers work to encourage improvements. Investee companies are often judged against internationally agreed norms or standards. Strategies vary.
Child labour exclusion
Has policies to avoid companies that employ children.
Responsible supply chain policy or theme
Has policies or a theme that relates to the responsible management of supply chains. These may relate to employment issues, notably people employed by their suppliers, as well as the sourcing of materials and products.
Modern slavery exclusion policy
Has a policy which excludes assets with involvement in Modern Slavery Meeting Peoples' Basic Needs
Demographic / ageing population theme
Has a thematic investment approach focusing on the ‘silver economy’ - in particular (typically) the issues and opportunities presented by changing demographics. This could include finance, healthcare and medicines and/ or longevity science to extend lifespans. Strategies vary.
Plant based / smart food production theme
Has a theme that may direct investment towards newer forms of food such as plant based meat alternatives. May have one or many themes.
Responsible food production or agriculture theme
Has a responsible food production or agriculture theme or strand of investment. May have a single or many themes.
Healthcare / medical theme
Healthcare and or medical theme or area of investment - may have a single or many themes Gilts & Sovereigns
Gilts / government bonds - exclude all
Does not invest in, or excludes, gilts and/or government bonds.
Does not invest in sovereigns
Does not invest in / excludes 'sovereigns' - debt issued by governments. See eg https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sovereign-debt.asp Banking & Financials
Invests in banks
Can include banks as part of their holdings / portfolio. Governance & Management
Governance policy
Has policies that relate to corporate governance issues such as board structure, executive remuneration, bribery and/or corporate corruption. These funds will typically avoid companies with poor practices. Strategies vary.
Avoids companies with poor governance
Avoids investing in companies with poor governance practices.(e.g. board structure, management practices etc.) Views may however vary on what counts as 'poor' practices - and funds may not immediately divest as they may prefer to work to encourage higher standards.
UN sanctions exclusion
Exclude companies that are subject to United Nations sanctions. See eg https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/un-sc-consolidated-list
Anti-bribery & corruption policy
Has policies explaining how managers will respond to assets / companies that do not comply with relevant anti-bribery and anti-corruption standards or laws. Strategies vary; options include stewardship/ engagement and divestment - or a combination.
Encourage board diversity e.g. gender
Encourage the companies they invest in to have more diverse board structures (e.g. more women on boards)
Encourage TCFD alignment for banks & insurance companies
Encourage the banks and insurance companies they invest in to publish climate change related financial information - as set out by the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (with the aim of helping investors measure and respond to climate risk).
Encourage higher ESG standards through stewardship activity
Aim to encourage higher ESG standards through responsible ownership / stewardship / engagement /voting activity
Require investee companies to report climate risk in R&A
Requires the companies they invest in to report on climate risks that are relevant to their business in their report and accounts Product / Service Governance
ESG integration strategy
Find fund / asset managers that factor in 'environmental, social and governance' issues as part of their investment decision making process. A focus on 'ESG' typically means a fund is carrying out additional research to help reduce ESG related risks. It does not necessarily mean a focus on sustainability. Strategies vary. See fund literature.
ESG factors included in Assessment of Value (AoV) report
Environmental, social and governance issues are part of this fund’s reporting of their ‘value’ to clients. AoV reporting is a statutory requirement. Including ESG factors in its calculation is not. Asset Size
Over 50% small / mid cap companies
Invests more than half of their money in smaller or medium sized companies. (i.e. below around £5 -10 billion)
Invests in small, mid & large cap companies / assets
Invests in a combination of small, medium and larger (potentially multinational) companies / assets. Impact Methodologies
Invests in sustainability / ESG disruptors
Specifically sets out to invest in companies that are regarded as 'disrupting' existing business practices - typically through the development of innovative (sustainability aware) products and/or practices. How The Fund/Portfolio Works
Positive selection bias
Focuses on finding and investing in companies with positive / beneficial attributes. This strategy can be applied in addition to exclusion criteria and engagement/stewardship activity.
Negative selection bias
Has principle 'ethical approach' to avoid companies by using negative screening criteria. Strategies vary.
Single resource theme or focus
Has a single resource themed focus in their investment strategy on a single natural 'resource' eg water.
ESG weighted / tilt
Invest more heavily in assets which have higher ESG ratings/standards or scores and less heavily in companies with lower ESG ratings. Where this is central to the strategy you should expect assets in most sectors. Strategies vary.
Combines ESG strategy with other SRI criteria
Invests in assets which have an ESG strategy (which is typically focused on avoiding companies that pose environmental, social or governance related risks) together with additional criteria such as positive and/or negative screens, themes and stewardship strategies.
Balances company 'pros and cons' / best in sector
Considers both the 'positive' and 'negative' aspects of company behaviour and makes balanced, considered decisions as part of their investment approach. May apply to a range of different issues and policy areas.
ESG risk mitigation focus
Focuses on the careful management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) related risks - typically by avoiding or being underweight in companies seen as posing major risks in these areas (i.e. not necessarily by using themes, exclusions etc).
SRI / ESG / Ethical policies explained on website
Publish explanations of their ethical, social and/or environmental policies online (i.e. investment decision making strategies/ buy/sell &/or asset management strategies).
Do not use stock / securities lending
Does not use stock lending for performance or risk purposes. Unscreened Assets & Cash
Assets typically aligned to sustainability objectives 70 - 79%
Holds between 70-79% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
Assets typically aligned to sustainability objectives 80 – 89%
Holds between 80-89% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
Assets typically aligned to sustainability objectives > 90%
Holds at least 90% of assets which align to the sustainability objectives; which are not being held purely for risk management purposes, such as derivatives and cash equivalent assets.
No ‘diversifiers’ used other than cash
Only invests in cash to aid the practical management (buying and selling) of assets and so do not use additional financial instruments.
All assets (except cash) meet published sustainability criteria
All assets - except cash - meet the sustainability criteria published in strategy documentation. Intended Clients & Product Options
Intended for clients interested in sustainability
Designed to meet the needs of individual investors with an interest in sustainability issues.
Intended for clients interested in ethical issues
Designed for clients who care about ethical and values-based issues, often alongside sustainability issues also.
Available via an ISA (OEIC only)
Available via a tax efficient ISA product wrapper.
Bespoke SRI / ESG portfolios available
Only applicable for DFM’s & portfolio providers. Find service providers who offer bespoke ('personalised') SRI / ESG portfolio options Fund Management Company InformationAbout The Business
Boutique / specialist fund management company
Find fund / asset management companies that are smaller or specialise in particular areas - notably, ideally ESG related. Strategies vary.
Responsible ownership / stewardship policy or strategy (AFM companywide)
Finds fund / asset management companies that have a published company wide stewardship, engagement and / or responsible ownership policy or strategy that covers all investments. Stewardship typically involves encouraging higher ESG standards through voting and dialogue.
ESG / SRI engagement (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that actively encourage higher 'environmental, social and governance' and / or 'sustainable and responsible investment' practices across investee companies - typically where the aim is to encourage positive change that is aligned with the best interests of investors. Strategies vary. See additional information and options.
Vote all* shares at AGMs / EGMs (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset managers that vote all* the shares they own at Annual General Meetings and Extraordinary General Meetings. A commitment to voting shares is a key indicator of 'responsible share ownership' demonstrating their support for or disagreement with management policy. (*situations can legitimately, occasionally occur where voting proves impossible, but in principle all shares should be voted.)
Responsible ownership / ESG a key differentiator (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset managers that consider responsible ownership and ESG to be a key differentiator for their business.
Responsible ownership policy for non SRI / sustainable options (AFM companywide)
Find options run by managers that apply Responsible ownership or 'Stewardship' policies to all or most of their investment assets. This means active involvement (e.g. voting, dialogue) with the companies across all or most funds, products and services.
Integrates ESG factors into all / most research (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues when deciding whether or not to invest in a company for all / almost all of their funds and other assets. This is increasingly seen as part of sound risk management.
In-house diversity improvement programme (AFM companywide)
Finds organisations / fund managers that have an in-house (company wide) diversity improvement programme - meaning that they are working to ensure that within their own businesses they employ people from diverse backgrounds - often typically focused on ethnicity and/or sex.
Diversity, equality & inclusion engagement policy (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that encourage the companies they invest in to have strong diversity, race, gender and other equality policies across all assets held, not simply screened or themed SRI/ESG funds. (ie Asset Management company wide).
Offer unstructured intermediary sustainable investment training
Fund management entity offers unstructured intermediary training on sustainable investment (ie for financial advisers and wealth managers) Collaborations & Affiliations
PRI signatory
Find fund / asset management companies that have signed up to the UN backed 'Principles of Responsible Investment'.
TNFD forum member (AFM companywide)
A member of the Taskforce for Nature Related Financial Disclosures group which aims to aid risk management and shift money towards nature-positive outcomes.
Investment Association (IA) member
Fund management entity is a member of the Investment Association https://www.theia.org/ Resources
In-house responsible ownership / voting expertise
Find fund / asset management companies that employ people to steer and support fund managers in voting shares at company AGM's and EGMs in ways that are consistent with encouraging higher ESG/sustainability standards.
Employ specialist ESG / SRI / sustainability researchers
Find a fund / asset management company that directly employs specialist ESG/SRI/sustainability researchers or analysts. This allows asset managers to discuss environmental, social and governance risks and opportunities directly with companies.
Use specialist ESG / SRI / sustainability research companies
Find fund / asset management companies that makes use of expert external research companies. This can help deliver specialist expertise and means resources are pooled with other investors.
ESG specialists on all investment desks (AFM companywide)
Finds organisations / fund managers that have one or more ESG/sustainability experts on all investment teams or 'desks' (all asset types) Accreditations
PRI A+ rated (AFM companywide)
Finds organisations / fund managers that have an A+ PRI rating - meaning they are highly rated according to the 'Principles of Responsible Investment'
UK Stewardship Code signatory (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset managers that are signatories to the FRC UK Stewardship Code, which sets out a framework for constructive investor / investee relations where managers are encouraged to behave like responsible, typically longer term 'company owners'. Engagement Approach
Regularly lead collaborative ESG initiatives (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that regularly initiate or run industry wide (collaborative) investor projects aimed at raising environmental, social and governance standards amongst investee companies.
Encourage responsible corporate taxation (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that are working with the companies they invest in to encourage more responsible corporate taxation.
Engaging on climate change issues
Fund / asset manager has stewardship /responsible ownership strategy that is focused on addressing climate change with investee assets.
Engaging with fossil fuel companies on climate change
Fund / asset manager has a stewardship /responsible ownership strategy that involves working with fossil fuel companies on climate change related issues. See fund manager website for details.
Engaging to reduce plastics pollution / waste
Fund / asset manager has stewardship /responsible ownership strategy with involves encouraging investee asset to reduce plastic waste and pollution.
Engaging to encourage responsible mining practices
Fund / asset manager has a stewardship / responsible ownership policy that means they are working to encourage more responsible mining practices - where environmental and social issues are properly dealt with by the companies they invest in.
Engaging on biodiversity / nature issues
The fund / asset manager has a responsible ownership / stewardship strategy that focuses on biodiversity and nature issues relating to the assets they invest the aim of which will be to reduce harm and or deliver improvement. Strategies vary. https://tnfd.global
Engaging to encourage a Just Transition
Fund / asset manager has a responsible ownership / stewardship strategy which means they are working to encourage the shift to more sustainable business practices in ways that respect and are sensitive to social issues and the impact change has on people effected by the changes that are taking place. https://www.transitionpathwayinitiative.org/ https://transitiontaskforce.net/
Engaging on human rights issues
Fund / asset manager has responsible ownership / stewardship strategy in place which aims to address human rights issues in investee companies (and potentially their suppliers) with the aim of raising standards
Engaging on labour / employment issues
Fund / asset manager has responsible ownership / stewardship strategy in place that aims to improve labour standards for the benefit of employees in investee companies (and potentially their suppliers)
Engaging on diversity, equality & / or inclusion issues
Fund / asset management company has a stewardship strategy in place which involves working to raise diversity, equality and inclusion standards across investee assets
Engaging to stop modern slavery
Fund / asset manager is working with the assets they hold to help stamp out modern slavery - where direct or indirect company employees are exploited for business benefits.
Engaging on governance issues
Fund / asset managers have stewardship strategies in place that focus on improving governance standards across investee assets
Engaging on responsible supply chain issues
Has a stewardship / responsible ownership strategy that encourages responsible supply chain - ie the managers will discuss environmental, social and governance issues with investee companies with the aim of raising standards
Engaging on the responsible use of AI
Working to address sustainability, ESG and related concerns around artificial intelligence.
Stewardship escalation policy
Escalation policies describe how a manager will proceed if stewardship / engagement activity is not successful in the short term. Company Wide Exclusions
Controversial weapons avoidance policy (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies (not funds) that avoid investment in 'controversial weapons' across all of their funds and other investment vehicles.
Review(ing) carbon / fossil fuel exposure for all funds (AFM companywide)
Find funds / asset managers that are reviewing, or have reviewed, their exposure to carbon intensive industries including (but not only) mining, oil and gas companies. (Typically with reference to climate change.)
Coal divestment policy (AFM companywide)
This fund / asset manager has a strategy in place that will lead them to exit direct investments in the coal mining industry. Managers ability to do this may depend on the geographic regions in which they invest. Climate & Net Zero Transition
Net Zero commitment (AFM companywide)
Fund / asset management organisations that have pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to ‘net zero’. Strategies vary - this area is changing rapidly.
Voting policy includes net zero targets (AFM companywide)
Fund / asset manager AGM / EGM voting strategy has processes in place that mean they will normally be expected to vote in a way that will encourage the transition to net zero greenhouse gas emissions.
Publish 'CEO owned' Climate Risk policy (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that have published a Climate Risk policy or statement that is signed / owned by their Chief Executive.
Net Zero - have set a Net Zero target date (AFM companywide)
This fund / asset management company has set a date by which they plan to achieve net zero greenhouse gas / CO2e emissions.
Encourage carbon / greenhouse gas reduction (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that are working with the companies they invest in to encourage reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions.
‘Forward Looking Climate Metrics’ published / ITR (AFM companywide)
Finds organisations / fund managers that have published ‘forward looking climate metrics’ e.g. 'implied temperature rise' data that are a total of the asset management company's share (% owned) of all the investee company emissions of the assets they manage, as well as their own direct and other indirect emissions.
Carbon offsetting - offset carbon as part of net zero plan (AFM companywide)
This fund / asset management company plans to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (CO2e) emissions with the help of a scheme that will lock away an amount of carbon that is equivalent to the company’s own emissions – so that the end result is ‘net zero’. Calculations and scope vary.
In-house carbon / GHG reduction policy (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that are working to reduce their own (fund management company) carbon/greenhouse gas emissions.
Committed to SBTi / Science Based Targets Initiative
See https://sciencebasedtargets.org/ Transparency
Publish responsible ownership / stewardship report (AFM companywide)
Find fund / asset management companies that publish a report detailing their responsible investment ownership - also known as 'Stewardship' - activity.
Full stewardship / responsible ownership policy information on company website
Find fund / asset management companies that publish information about their sustainable and responsible investment strategies on their company website.
Publish full voting record (AFM companywide)
Fund / asset management companies that publish a full record of how they vote their shares at AGMs (annual general meetings) and EGMs (extraordinary general meetings). Voting strategies have an important role to play encouraging higher environmental, social and governance standards.
Paris Alignment plan publicly available (AFM companywide)
This fund / asset management company has published a plan that explains how they will align to the climate change commitments made at the Paris Climate Talks, COP21.
Net Zero transition plan publicly available (AFM companywide)
This fund / asset management company has published a plan that explains how they are going to achieve net zero greenhouse gas / CO2e emissions. CommentsPlease Note:
Sustainable, Responsible &/or ESG Policy:Sarasin & Partners has one of the longest track records of investing in the food and agriculture space, having launched the strategy in 2008. Our strategy is differentiated from other food and agricultural strategies through our allocation, both along the food and agriculture value chain, and geographically. We tailor our wider three core pillar (thematic investing, responsible ownership, active management) investment approach to opportunities that underpin growth in the food and agriculture economy. Many food and agriculture investment strategies concentrate on the largest agriculture-related companies, which tend to be heavily exposed to large-scale, intensive farming operations. This sector is highly productive with tightly managed, pest controlled and waste minimised inputs. It relies on a system managed to maximise arable and economic yields, but offers limited room for further improvement in capital returns and productivity growth and is increasingly challenged by the trend towards a more sustainable, resilient, and lower greenhouse gasses emitting agricultural system. Analysis of the changing economic value in the food chain highlights the rapid increase in the downstream food economy: in the storage, processing and retailing of food and in the health and food technology which offer new and sustainable growth opportunities. Underlying these themes is a shift towards more sustainable and environmentally considerate approaches to food, which is strongly reflected in the Strategy’s ESG policy: since launch, the Strategy has avoided exposure to pesticides, palm oil and beef producers. The Food and Agriculture Opportunities Fund also avoids companies that are materially engaged in certain sectors, including the production or distribution of tobacco, armaments, gambling and adult entertainment. Process:Our aim is to deliver enduring value for our clients across market cycles. When we invest on behalf of our clients, we look to the long-term prospects of a company. We purchase shares where there is a case for enduring value creation, and where this is currently underappreciated by the market. We also believe that responsible companies will tend to create more durable economic value. Specifically, we favour businesses that articulate compelling long-term strategies, and take seriously their responsibilities to their customers, supply chain, staff, local communities, the environment, and their shareholders. Once we become shareholders on behalf of our clients, we believe it is important to build lines of communications with the executives and the Board of Directors. Stewardship is as much about ongoing responsible ownership as to the considered approach to selecting investee companies. We also believe that our clients’ long-term interests are not best served by a narrow focus on relative performance against a market index. The service we offer goes beyond beating a benchmark: first and foremost, we start with our clients’ needs and take a holistic approach. We would not, for instance, deploy capital in a company whose success involves causing significant harm elsewhere, which could damage our clients’ interests. Where we believe we can play a positive role in boosting broader market returns through improved government policies or market practices we will seek to catalyse change. We aim to invest in companies that benefit from our ‘global themes’, or societal trends such as digitalisation, automation, ageing, emerging consumption, climate change and security. Further, we seek companies that are able to drive long-term performance through credible strategies to transform these strengths into enduring value, and demonstrating robust governance structures that will protect shareholders’ and creditors’ interests. Environmental, governance and social factors are considered alongside other value drivers in determining a company’s ‘investment case’ and ‘risks to investment’. Companies’ long-term success depends on strategies that sustainably deliver goods or services valued by customers, such that companies earn an attractive return, maintain their license to operate and prosper. A company’s relations with core stakeholders, from employees, to suppliers, to regulators, to local communities to other groups that are impacted by (and may impact) the company’s operations, as well as its environmental performance, are important considerations. ESG is, therefore, a required part of our analysis, and where we identify potential material impacts, this must be reflected within the valuation of each company. As part of our financial modelling we assess the materiality of ESG headwinds or tailwinds for every company and incorporate this into our fair value assessment. This therefore has an impact on portfolio construction as it is part of the fundamental assessment of a company, which is considered in the investment decision and position sizing. The key sustainability issues for food and agriculture include, but are not limited to, deforestation, depletion of water tables and contamination of the water system, carbon emissions from agriculture, pesticides, circular economy and biodiversity.
Idea Generation The Strategy focuses exclusively on opportunities in the food and agriculture sector. We begin by identifying themes from both a top-down, “big picture” perspective and from our bottom-up, fundamental analysis of industries and companies. By looking at the world with a multi-thematic perspective. we ensure that we are investing in alignment with the development of society, and avoid business activities that are unsustainable or in structural decline. Whilst these themes are grounded in sustainability, climate change as one of our six mega-themes has the most direct link to sustainability. Examples of these themes include diet change, nutrition & health, rising productivity, decarbonising food system; and food security and resilience. We then produce a set of companies in which we could invest to capture each theme. The combination of these forms our investment universe, which contains around 550 companies that the Strategy could potentially invest in. From this discrete investment universe, we conduct thorough fundamental analysis, including an ESG assessment.
Stock Selection Our thematic process aims to capture future growth, which demands consideration of sustainability as we seek investable ideas. Once we determine which companies are worthy of analysis, our analysts begin to build the investment case, and determine fair value. Our research process has ESG explicitly integrated into the analysis, as well as the wider considerations to the investment thesis. These impacts can be positive or negative. We utilise our own framework and ratings system, Sarasin Sustainability Impact Matrix (SIM) to represent our proprietary ESG analysis. This analysis is bottom-up and driven by primary research, supplemented with ESG data from MSCI, ISS and other sources. These are then summarised in a higher-level E, S and G traffic light rating. This tool evaluates approximately 160 data points, categorising each factor as Red, Amber, or Green, based on the severity, materiality and potential impact (both positive and negative) for each. The ratings reflect absolute, not relative, risks to capital. This means that companies in a particular sector or geography may cluster around higher or lower scores reflecting in part the business practices of a sector or country they operate in. The lower scores for this geography/sector would naturally suggest we need to be more cautious here. Furthermore, analysts assign an overall ESG score from A-E, and momentum indicators where we believe there to be significant direction of travel. “A” indicates ESG is a positive tailwind for the investment case; whereas “E” is effectively un-investable. The outcome of this rating system results in an overall ESG score between A and E. Our analysts are all ESG analysts, and have the ability to adjust various inputs to their models of fair value for ESG impacts. The analysts own their valuations, but are challenged by the team, including our stewardship specialists on any ESG factors included or not considered. This is often an adjustment to the discount rate/ weighted average cost of capital (WACC) but can be incorporated into capital expenditure forecasts, impairments, revenue and/or cost impacts to name a few. We believe this analysis will depend on the case in hand, so analysts need to have the opportunity to determine how the economics of the business will in reality be impacted. Our analysts will also simulate three differing scenarios; bull, base and bear that can be used to reflect the pace or scale of ESG impacts to the economic model. Materiality must be modelled based on an understanding of the economics, not rules. As specific ESG issues will be more or less material depending on a company’s sector and business model, we do not adopt a formulaic link between the “traffic light” assessment and overall ESG rating (e.g. two ambers and one green do not necessarily equate to a B). Instead, a stock note will illustrate how our assessment of material ESG issues (structured by the “traffic lights”) has informed our view of a company’s ESG risk and materiality, which is captured by the letter rating. The ESG assessment will naturally inform the final stock rating alongside other inputs. For instance, a stock rated 2 with an ESG rating of C will incorporate an analysis, how this flows through to the model and the valuation impact from the identified ESG factors. Whilst we have a team of stewardship specialists that are custodians of our ESG considerations and engagement activity, they are part of the investment team and contribute to team discussion and challenge alongside the thematic equity analysts.
Portfolio Construction We aim to build a portfolio of between 35 and 50 stocks and this will vary depending on the number of compelling investment ideas we identify and the risk profile of these companies. Stocks are selected from the Food & Agriculture Buy list but the Portfolio Managers are not compelled to buy any particular stock - they are fully responsible for the construction and performance of the Strategy. Once we have bought a stake in a company, we stay close to it. We monitor the business’ strategic outlook and performance, its critical value drivers to ensure their persistence, and our conviction in the stock’s long-term value proposition. Engagement and voting are key considerations throughout our research process in order to communicate with management on ESG and other issues and press where we see a need for change. A considered approach to voting is vital not just because it is a key avenue through which we can express our views, but also because it supports our relationships with the company’s Board of Directors and executives.
Data sources The vast majority of our ESG analysis is proprietary, integrating bottom-up research across our 15 key E, S and G issues. This primary analysis is complemented by secondary data sources and feeds directly into company valuation, investment conviction and position sizing. Our traffic light system helps identify potential, minimal or material risks to capital and informs our active engagement priorities. We use a range of external providers to support our research, including MSCI and ISS, as well as ESG networks such as ICGN and ACGA, alongside sell-side and independent research. While these inputs enhance our process, they do not replace our proprietary ESG and stewardship analysis, which remains the foundation of our approach. MSCI data is also used for ethical screening. We incorporate company disclosures, insights from external experts, NGOs and government publications, and participate in academic research and industry discussions to identify emerging themes and opportunities. Additionally, we leverage the proprietary Sustainability Matrix® developed by Bank J. Safra Sarasin, which aggregates and analyses data from multiple providers (including MSCI ESG, GMI, RepRisk and Vigeo Eiris) to provide further sustainability insights. Resources, Affiliations & Corporate Strategies:Our approach to responsible investment is delivered primarily through active stewardship, rather than a single overarching policy. This is articulated through our Stewardship Framework, Principles for Engaged Ownership, Ownership Discipline, and Corporate Governance & Voting Guidelines, all of which are publicly available on our website: https://sarasinandpartners.com/stewardship/. Our annual Stewardship Report provides a consolidated overview of how these frameworks are implemented in practice. We have a dedicated stewardship team responsible for leading engagement, voting and public policy advocacy. ESG integration is embedded across the investment team, with all analysts and portfolio managers incorporating ESG factors into company analysis and investment decisions. Analysts retain ownership of ESG ratings, which are developed in collaboration with, and approved by, stewardship specialists – ensuring consistency and joint accountability across the investment process. Our governance structure supports robust oversight of stewardship activities. The Board retains ultimate responsibility, with stewardship a standing agenda item, and delegates implementation to the Executive Committee. Oversight is further supported by the Asset Management Committee and the Stewardship Steering Committee, which provides cross-business input, reviews stewardship priorities, and oversees policies, activities and reporting. The Head of Stewardship leads the programme, working closely with senior investment leaders. We also convene external advisory panels, such as our Climate Active Advisory Panel, to provide independent expert input on key themes. We are active participants in a wide range of global initiatives and collaborative engagements spanning environmental, social and governance themes. These include the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative (NZAM), Climate Action 100+ (as a co-lead engager), Nature Action 100+, CDP, Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN). We also contribute to initiatives focused on plastics and circular economy (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Plastic Solutions Investor Alliance), human rights and labour standards (Investor Alliance for Human Rights, ICCR, FAIRR), and responsible technology (World Benchmarking Alliance, Global Network Initiative). A full list of our memberships, initiatives, and relevant policies and statements is available on our website: https://sarasinandpartners.com/stewardship/signatories/ |
||||||||