+
Please help us to improve our service...
Are you a Financial Services or Investment Professional?
Thank you!
FEM logo
Fund EcoMarket

the sustainable, responsible and ethical investment information hub

Pensions & Social Investment: Law Commission review

We are delighted to welcome the Law Commission review of ‘Pensions & Social Investment’ published June 2017.

This important review, whilst not fully digested yet, appears to support and even advance the view that social, as well as other related ethical and environmental considerations should form part of our pensions investment landscape and decision making.

You can see pensions media coverage of the Law Commission report here.

Or download the full report here

The Law Commission introduction to this document reads as follows:

“Our findings on social investment

The barriers to social investment by pension funds that we identified were, in most cases, structural and behavioural rather than legal or regulatory.

We set out options for reform where we have identified steps which could be taken by others to address these barriers. We also make some recommendations where we have identified that the law could be improved so as to reduce the impact of these barriers. These recommendations were identified in our 2014 report and have been updated in light of the current pensions landscape.

We recommend that:

  • For trust-based pensions, the Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations 2005 should be amended in the following ways:
    • The reference to “social, environmental or ethical considerations” should be amended to ensure that it accurately reflects the distinction between financial factors and non-financial factors.
    • There should be a requirement that the statement of investment principles (SIP) produced by trustees should state trustees’ policy (if any) on stewardship.
  • For contract-based pensions, the Financial Conduct Authority should require schemes’ Independent Governance Committees to report on a firm’s policies in relation to:
    • evaluating the long-term risks of an investment, including relating to corporate governance or environmental or social impact;
    • considering members’ ethical and other concerns; and
    • stewardship.
  • We also recommend that the Financial Conduct Authority should issue guidance for contract-based pension providers on financial and non-financial factors, to follow the guidance for trust-based schemes given by The Pensions Regulator.

We suggest ‘options for reform’ in the following three areas:

  • investment in social enterprises (such as charities and community interest companies);
  • investment in property and infrastructure; and
  • encouraging savers to engage more actively with their pensions.”

[http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/pension-funds-and-social-investment/]

 

Additional Information

Published 18 June 2018 – The FCA response to this review is here

Sign Up to our Newsletter

If you are a Financial Services Industry professional you can sign up for our newsletter

Click Here

Latest News

SRI Services and Partners 2019 event videos now live
December 6, 2019

I am delighted to announce that our event videos are now live on the SRI Services YouTube channel. Each session was recorded – so for anyone who was unable to attend this is the next best thing. (nb The event was CPD accredited so you may like to keep a record of the sessions your […]

Recent changes to Fund EcoMarket
December 6, 2019

Just a brief note to let you know about some of the changes we have made to Fund EcoMarket recently. Changes to functionality You can now… Use the new map on our ‘Find an Adviser’ area  – which enables potential adviser clients to find local advisers more easily. You can now use the Search ‘recently […]

Investment Association Responsible Investment Framework announced
November 18, 2019

The Investment Association’s long awaited Responsible Investment framework launched today (18 November 2019). Although I am yet to digest the detail, this looks entirely constructive to me. The IA team have differentiated between different fund options sensibly {thereby avoiding the ‘binary thinking trap’) and recognised the relevance of both individual funds and fund management companies. […]