FEM logo
Fund EcoMarket

the sustainable, responsible and ethical investment information hub

Style Name: Ethical funds

Investment funds which focus significantly on applying ethical screening criteria when setting out where they can or can not invest.

Brief description of Style

Ethical funds typically consider a wide range of issues – with an emphasis on considering ‘personal values’ related issues.  These funds will typically exclude industries or practices that have been identified as being ‘unethical’ (or ‘unacceptable’) and favour companies with higher standards.

Where an ethical fund will and will not invest is set out in their published policies (summarised in fudn criteria).  Strategies vary significantly both in terms of the issues considered and the way in which issues are dealt with (the fund’s ‘approach’).

Commonly considered ethical issues include: involvement in armaments and/or weapons manufacture, tobacco, animal testing, alcohol, gambling and pornography.  Some funds focus on only a few of these, others consider all of the above and more.

Ethical funds almost always consider social and environmental sustainability issues in addition to ‘values based’ issues – as they are integral to ethical behaviours.

Some funds focus on applying strict ethical exclusion criteria, others are  more positively focused and may apply ‘best in sector’ screens – which means some ethical fudns can invest in most sectors.

SRI approach applied

This is a broad group of funds which is characterised by their focus on  ‘ethical’ or ‘values based’ issues (which funds in other SRI Styles may ignore).

Some funds will aim to apply ‘absolute exclusion’ criteria.  Others may allow some involvement in excluded areas as absolute avoidance can be problematic for larger companies – for example 5 or 10% of annual turnover. Where a limited involvement is allowed this is often referred to as having a ‘de minimis’ limit or ‘tolerance’.

These funds generally have some form of ESG (environmental, social and governance) integration strategy that aims to exclude companies seen as presenting high ESG risks – as well as responsible ownership strategies – which aim to encourage higher standards.  The extent to which these impact stock selection (and ownership strategies) varies significantly.

Some of the funds in this group also have a significant emphasis on helping to deliver positive impacts and outcomes – although again, this varies. (See fund filters).

See ‘Policies’ and ‘Features’ filters for further information.

SRI issues covered

Ethical funds generally research the positive and negative aspects of a wide range of  issues including some or all of the following:

  • Traditional ‘ethical’ issues such as: armaments trade, pornography, alcohol production,  gambling and animal welfare
  • Social issues, such as; health and safety, employment practices, diversity and equality and human rights concerns and the avoidance of companies taht may use child labour
  • Environmental issues, such as; pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, green transport, waste management and the use of natural resources
  • Governance issues, such as; executive remuneration, board structure, diversity, bribery and corruption.

The sectors that are most commonly excluded are tobacco and armaments manufacture.

The defining features of these funds is that they consider ‘ethical’ or ‘values/principles based’ issues as well as social, environmental and governance issues.

Variation across Style segment

The number of issues covered, behind the scenes activity and the depth of research employed varies across this group. Resources levels and commitment to engagement also vary. Although most fund managers make use of external research some funds are supported by significant in house resources  whereas others are not.

Impact on investment strategy

Some ethical funds invest in most sectors whereas others are more restricted.

Larger sectors that these funds typically avoid or are underweight in are oil and gas, pharmaceutical and tobacco companies – however strategies vary.

Who is this Style most likely to appeal to?

These funds are more suitable for investors who are looking to avoid unethical industries and/or practices or benefit from investing in companies with strong ethical credentials.

Associated Styles

Many Sustainability Themed funds have ethical criteria that are similar to those in ethical funds. Some Environmental, Sustainability Tilt and ESG Plus funds also  have similar policies although many do not and are often less extensive.

Associated Jargon

These funds tend to be referred to as ‘ethical’.  However no single strategy suits everyone so it is important to read fund details before recommending funds.

Providers

Offered by a range of often well-established fund providers.

Note – these funds tend to have been launched earlier than many of the funds in other SRI Styles so often have highly comprehensive (broadh based) strategies.

 

 

Sign Up to our Newsletter

If you are a Financial Services Industry professional you can sign up for our newsletter

Click Here

Latest News

SRI Services welcomes new FCA ‘ESG and Sustainable Investment Principles’
July 19, 2021

SRI Services welcomes new FCA ESG and Sustainable Investment Principles

Six Monthly Fund EcoMarket user report – exploring sustainable investment trends.
July 13, 2021

 This information relates to Fund EcoMarket user activity from 1 January – to 30 June 2021 Key findings: Use of the Fund EcoMarket (retail sustainable investment fund tool) website increased by 15% over the six months to 30 June (from H2 2020), pointing to continued growth in interest in retail ESG and sustainable investment. The […]

Regulatory developments in sustainable investment (July 2021)
July 12, 2021

As you will know, the focus on ‘ESG’ (environmental, social and governance) has ramped up  dramatically recently right through the investment value chain.  News is now emerging almost daily from all quarters – from the public facing NGOs (notably Make My Money Matter)  through to the United Nations – via UK government departments and our […]