FEM logo
Fund EcoMarket

the sustainable, responsible and ethical investment information hub

About SRI (… ESG, Sustainable Investment and more)

What is ‘SRI’?

FEM-tag-cloud‘Sustainable and Responsible Investment*’ is the broad term that we and many others use to describe investments which pay close attention to environmental, social, governance (ESG) as well as ethical, sustainability and/or ‘responsible ownership’ issues.

(*This is a pretty big, diverse area which is why TLA’s tend to work well … but be aware it is common for people to not know what ESG stands for – and ‘SRI’ is also often used to mean ‘Socially Responsible Investment’!).

The range of issues covered is seen by some ascomplicated – but our view is that this is ‘necessary diversity’ – as it offers investors different ways to reflect the many different things they care about through their investments.

These funds have been available to individual investors since 1984 and different options have emerged to meet the needs of different investors.

The UK’s earliest funds were launched primarily to meet the needs of Quaker and Methodist investors.  Other funds soon followed with broadly similar strategies – focusing on personal, ethical values. A second wave of funds emerged a few years later which put environmental and sustainability related issues front and centre. (Although there has always been much cross over between these groups.)

At around the time of the millennium a third strand emerged – which involved using ‘responsible share ownership’ as a way for investors to  actively encouraging higher corporate standards – in ways that would also benefit shareholders.

With growing activity in the institutional and the pensions markets in recent years ‘responsible ownership’ has flourished alongside a newer approach known as ‘ESG’.  The core aim of ESG (‘environmental, social and governance’) strategies is to help reduce risk by integrating additional analysis into standard research processes. In practice these funds vary greatly.  Some are very similar to sustainability funds as their analysis runs deep – other are ‘lighter touch’.

Today there are many different fund managers combining these different strategies in many different ways which means individual investors enjoy more choice than ever before.

However, terminology and labels are used differently by different people.  Our view is that it is best not to get too hung up on jargon – but it is  important to check what people mean when they use a particular label or acronym, which is why we suggest people ‘look under the bonnet’.

Our system of ‘SRI Styles’ helps to highlight the main areas of difference.  However users of this system should bear in mind that funds vary – so using additional filters is also important.  There is crossover between the styles – as well as differences within the styles.

This service is provided for information purposes only and intended for use by financial services professionals.  Please speak with a qualified financial adviser for further information.

We do not deal directly with investors and are not authorised to offer advice.

Sign Up to our Newsletter

If you are a Financial Services Industry professional you can sign up for our newsletter

Click Here

Latest News

SRI Services response to FCA SDR and labels consultation DP21/4
January 17, 2022

I am delighted to share our response to the FCAs recent ‘Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) and investment labels‘ discussion paper. Our response was rather lengthy,  so you may prefer to focus on the summary of key points below (the text below is ‘as submitted’): Download our response here: FCA SDR DP 21 4 SRI Services […]

Top 50 Fund EcoMarket sustainable investment searches 2021
January 17, 2022

  Below is a list of the top 50 filter options selected by Fund EcoMarket users during the course of 2021. This shows that, as in previous years, a wide range of filters are used by Fund EcoMarket users, most probably as that is what is required in order to offer advice on sustainable investment […]

ShareAction report on asset managers’ proxy votes
December 17, 2021

ShareAction has just published their 2021 report on shareholder voting. The gist of the report is that many shareholders, most importantly amongst them the largest (because they have the most votes) are not supporting shareholder resolutions on environmental and social issues – even when their proxy advisers are recommending they should. There will doubtless be […]